citizens united

Newspapers hail ATP’s win for the Constitution, free speech

Posted on June 27, 2012 by Donald Ferguson

From today’s Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:

The importance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in American Tradition Partnership Inc. v. Bullock cannot be understated.

On Monday, the high court voted 5-4 to strike down Montana’s 100-year-old ban on political expenditures by corporations. Citing its landmark 2010 Citizens United ruling, the court held that “political speech does not lose First Amendment protection simply because its source is a corporation.”

As Stephen M. Hoersting, president of the Institute for Individualism, notes (in National Review Online), not only has the court upheld the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution — “This Constitution … shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound hereby” — but “communications made independent of candidates and political party committees pose no threat of corruption as a matter of law, not case-by-case adjudication.”

The “progressive” contention of automatic “apparent corruption,” rejected in Citizens and affirmed in American Tradition, is not apparent at all.

Supposedly objective liberal reportage on the ruling mixed into the narrative such biased phrases as “torrent of spending,” “secret world” and “unforeseen consequences.” How sad and tragic that these “progressives” — regressives, really — have no concept of the victory for free speech that the Supreme Court’s ruling truly is.

Go here to read the full editorial.

Ferguson responds to Obama attack on ATP

Posted on June 25, 2012 by Donald Ferguson

In a statement Monday the White House harshly criticized the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling earlier in the day in American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock, which upheld ATP’s claim states cannot deny citizens free speech in defiance of the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC.  In the statement, President Obama referred to the Citizens United ruling as a “mistake”

ATP Executive Director Donald Ferguson offered this response to the President:

“Free speech and freedom of association are God-given rights protected by the First Amendment.  Politicians cannot strip citizens of their right to speak freely because politicians do not like their speech or the manner in which they associate.  A free country is one where citizens can speak however they choose without fear of prosecution, threats or intimidation.

“If Barack Obama feels a ‘fair’ election is one in which his opponents cannot speak he is free to run for office elsewhere.  I understand Venezuela may have an opening soon.

ATP wins Supreme Court case, calls on Schweitzer, Bullock to resign

Posted on by Donald Ferguson

ONCE AGAIN AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP STANDS ON THE SIDE OF THE LAW, CONSTITUTION

Once again American Tradition Partnership has prevailed in court, for the simple reason the law and the Constitution are always on our side.  ATP has now emerged victorious in every case brought to a court of law.

We are pleased the Justices of the United States Supreme Court have upheld the Constitution’s guarantee of free speech without limits or retribution by government officials. As clearly stated by the First Amendment, politicians cannot outlaw political speech to create a favorable political environment or because they simply don’t like the type of speaker.

This reversal on summary judgment is a resounding rejection of Governor Schweitzer’s and Attorney General Bullock’s indefensible attacks on Montanans’ God-given right of free political speech. ATP has always adhered to every letter of applicable law and we will continue to expose corruption and misbehavior by government officials.

As outlined in our case the unlawful misbehavior by Governor Schweitzer, Attorney General Bullock, Senator Esp and the revolving door of poorly-qualified, politicized and downright corrupt Political Practices Commissioners is precisely why Montanans should be allowed to speak freely about politicians without limit or fear of persecution.

Schweitzer and Bullock sought to preserve limits on political speech that may shed sunlight on their corrupt practices, and were rebuked by the Supreme Court. Only the corrupt should fear free political discourse.

Over the coming months Montanans will find out about the corrupt practices and radical positions Schweitzer and Bullock were trying to hide through threats and intimidation.

This is not the first time Governor Schweitzer’s administration has been rebuked by a federal court for unlawfully attacking private citizens he disagrees with.

In 2009, the Ninth Circuit Court ruled Montana “Political Practices Commissioner” Dennis Unsworth, a political appointee of Gov. Brian Schweitzer, violated the constitutional rights of the Canyon Ferry Baptist Church when he falsely ruled the church must file as a political committee.  The church sued, and the Montana Legislature eventually approved a $225,000.00 payout to Schweitzer’s victims.

ATP previously sued the Schweitzer administration after Unsworth issued a false and defamatory “finding” against the group just three days after ATP won a different free speech case against the Governor.  In retaliation for his headline-making defeat the Schweitzer administration issued a 41-page document making numerous false and outlandish damaging claims about ATP.

At the end of the “legal finding” the Schweitzer administration openly admitted they had no evidence whatsoever to back up any of the claims.

Both Governor Schweitzer and Attorney General Bullock assumed office by taking a sworn oath to uphold the rights of Montanans.

Given Governor Schweitzer and Attorney General Bullock’s latest court loss in a case in which they failed to honor their oath, American Tradition Partnership’s grassroots members across Montana ask both men to tender their resignations immediately.

National Journal: Supreme Court will stand by American Tradition Partnership

Posted on June 8, 2012 by Donald Ferguson

National Journal reports this morning on liberal claims that American Tradition Partnership’s challenge to Montana’s unconstitutional anti-speech laws offers the U.S. Supreme Court an opportunity to overturn its Citizens United v. FEC ruling.

The Court simply won’t, and will in all likelihood strike down Montana’s clearly unconstitutional laws without wasting time with a hearing.

National Journal reports ATP’s challenge will, in fact, strengthen, free speech laws and lead to uninfringed political speech in Montana.

National Journal members can read the full article here.

The case, American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock, centers on a century-old Montana law that prohibits corporations from spending money on political campaigns. The U.S. Supreme Court appeared to have rendered the state law unconstitutional in 2010 in its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that allowed unlimited corporate and union spending on elections; but the Montana Supreme Court unexpectedly upheld the ban last year.

The state judges contended that Citizens United does not apply to Montana’s anti-corruption measure–arguing, in effect, that the state should be able to determine how to regulate campaigns within its borders. Supporters of the state court’s decision, according to Rick Hasen, a campaign finance expert at the University of California (Irvine) School of Law, have framed it as a defense of federalism, a tactic calibrated to appeal to the Supreme Court’s majority conservative bloc. …

Legal experts of all ideological stripes expect the Supreme Court to strike down the Montana law, maybe as early as this month, even though more than 20 states have filed briefs in support of Montana’s position, contending that Citizens United in its short life has already had an observable, corrupting influence on national politics.

Ruling otherwise wouldn’t necessarily require the Court to reconsider Citizens United wholesale; it could instead carve out some breathing room for states to regulate and still maintain the framework that allows unlimited contributions to outside political groups, corporations, and unions. But because the Court’s composition has not changed since the decision came down, the justices are much more likely to choose the path of least resistance at their June 14 conference: They could merely vote to strike down the Montana law without a hearing.

ATP asks U.S. Supreme Court to review Montana rejection of Citizens United

Posted on March 27, 2012 by Donald Ferguson
Today three corporations asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Montana Supreme Court’s holding that corporations in Montana may be banned from making independent political expenditures by expressly advocate the election or defeat of state candidates. In the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protects such core political speech even if made by corporations in federal elections and could not be banned. But the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ban on corporate independent expenditures for such speech, based on Montana’s uniqueness, especially its history of corruption.
The U.S. Supreme Court has already stayed the Montana Supreme Court’s decision, meaning that corporations can currently speak despite the state court’s holding. The stay is in effect while the U.S. Supreme Court decides whether to accept the case for review, and, if it is accepted, then until the case is decided.
In their petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, the corporations explained that the Montana decision was in conflict with both the Court’s holding that corporations could not be banned from doing core political speech and the Court’s reasoning that the independence of such speech eliminated any risk of corrupting candidates. The petition stressed the importance of upholding respect for the rule of law, the Supreme Court’s decisions, and the Supreme Court itself. It noted the flood of cases that would arise from other states seeking similar as-applied exceptions if Montana’s decision stands. And it noted the profound constitutional problems that would arise if Montana’s arguments were allowed to prevail.  For example, if Montana’s argument that it  is unique because it is sparsely populated were to prevail, this would mean that would-be speakers in densely populated urban areas have greater speech protection than those in suburban or rural areas.
James Bopp, Jr., lead counsel for the corporations, states: “If Montana can ban core political speech because of Montana’s unique characteristics, free speech will be seriously harmed. Speakers will be silenced because of corruption by others over a century ago or because Montana candidates have traditionally spent little money on their campaigns. This puts speakers at the mercy of others and of past actions over which they have no control. The First Amendment’s protections cannot be so conditioned.”
The case in the U.S. Supreme Court is captioned American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock. In the Montana Supreme Court, it was captioned Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney General. The petition is available at the James Madison Center website at http://www.jamesmadisoncenter.org/cases/files/2012/02/Cert-Petition-final.pdf.

 

Environmentalists hurl death threats at ATP. We don’t back down.

Posted on March 23, 2012 by Donald Ferguson

“I really hope somebody kills you. I really mean that.  That would make me very, very happy.”

That message, left on my personal cell phone, is just one of the many I get every day from radical environmentalists.

It comes as no surprise to me.  Environmentalists speak the language of violence.

And they have reason to target me with their threats.

    We are going to the Supreme Court to affirm the rights of Americans to speak out without fear of government harassment.

You see, in the state of Montana it is against the law for employers to spend their company money to speak out about issues affecting their business.

But it’s perfectly legal for radical liberal groups to do the same.

Enforced by a bully liberal governor and a liberal attorney general, both of whom preside over a corrupt administration, we have seen everyday citizens hauled into court for questioning the liberal establishment.

It’s gotten so bad a federal court lashed out at the liberal administration, accusing them of “petty bureaucratic harassment” of conservatives.

But they made a mistake.

They came after American Tradition Partnership when we exposed the truth about them.

And we fight back.

So we took them to court.

We won.

The court ruled they could no longer attack our First Amendment rights.

But they refused to accept the court’s ruling.

They even attacked the U.S. Supreme Court!

So now, that’s where we’re going.

I am taking our case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Two Supreme Court justices have already sided with me, issuing an injunction telling the governor and attorney general to stop their illicit attacks on citizens.

But our legal fight is expensive, and we are not assured victory.

If we lose crooked politicians could shut down American Tradition Partnership and silence people who speak out against radical environmentalism.

But if we win we affirm YOUR right to speak out against corrupt politicians and their Gang Green henchmen, without fear of government harassment.

Being unable to use government resources to harass people who speak the truth would be a serious blow to Gang Green.

So now they are coming after me with death threats.

Unfortunately for them I don’t back down.  Ever.

Even in the face of death threat.

But I do need you to stand with me.

Go here to chip in $500, $250, $100, $50, $10 or more to support American Tradition Partnership in this fight.

Whatever you can afford will be great appreciated.

Your gift will go to support American Tradition Partnership in this fight to affirm your First Amendment rights.

This fight is hard. And expensive.

But we must wage it.

    I refuse to stand by while two crooked politicians haul citizens into court simply for telling the truth about a corrupt regime.

And I will not let them silence American Tradition Partnership.

Even when their henchmen leave death threats on my cell phone.

So may I please ask you to go here and chip in $10 or more to help me win this Supreme Court fight against crooked Gang Green allies and their violence-spewing henchmen?

I’m fighting for citizens who have already been hauled into court, and for people-powered citizen groups like American Tradition Partnership who have also been targeted with bogus government harassment and death threats.

And most importantly, I’m fighting for you.  If victorious in their fight to silence American Tradition Partnership they will go after citizens like you next.

This fight, which is now in the Supreme Court, is expensive and tough.

And now they’re hurling death threats. So please stand with me.

Go here to chip in $500, $250, $100, $50, $10 or more to support American Tradition Partnership in this fight.

Sincerely,

Donald Ferguson
Executive Director
American Tradition Partnership

P.S.  Death threats on my personal cell phone.  That’s what they’ve stooped to.

Why? We have a case going before the U.S. Supreme Court to shatter Gang Greens’ illicit political monopoly.

Please let me know you stand with me in the face of death threats and a Supreme Court fight to protect your First Amendment rights.

Go here to chip in $500, $250, $100, $50, $10 or more to support American Tradition Partnership in this fight.

« Older Entries